A COO, CTO, commercial lead, or risk owner can make decisions.
Buyer evidence pathScore, inspect, package, request.
- Score readiness firstPRISMFind the first deployment gap before a call.
- Inspect proofPHANTOMReplay the governed approval boundary.
- Verify evidenceEvidence roomChoose role and workflow proof.
- Build passportPassportPackage readiness signals into one artifact.
- Send ATLAS intakeRequestCarry context into founder review.
Diagnostic request
Start with the workflow, not the hype.
HARNEXA works with European commerce operators that need governed AI agents: persistent identity, scoped permissions, approval boundaries, CLEAR evaluation, and audit evidence from the first run.
The first conversation is a fit check. No open-ended consulting funnel, no legal compliance claims, no autonomous writes without a human boundary.
Carried contextWhat the founder sees before replying.
- Role
- Founder / COO Buyer lens carried into founder review
- Workflow
- Agentic commerce assistant Operating context for the proposed path
- PRISM
- Pending Readiness score not attached yet
- PHANTOM
- Pending Proof run not attached yet
Commerce, CRM, SKU, inventory, promo, returns, or workflow logs exist.
Consequential actions can pause for approval before execution.
Time saved, accuracy, conversion, compliance, cost, or SLA can be measured.
Choose the entry point
One request path, fixed-scope by default.
Start here10 business days
Agentic Commerce Diagnostic
You know agents matter, but need a governed workflow map, value case, and first deployment candidate.
OutputGovernance gap assessment, top-3 agent candidates, value/risk ranking, and sprint roadmap.
Request this path →Agent sprawl1 week
Agent Inventory & Governance Sprint
Your teams already use copilots, agents, automations, or shadow workflows and no one has a clean inventory.
OutputAgent register, permission map, risk classes, revocation paths, and remediation sequence.
Request this path →AI visibility2-4 weeks
Agent Visibility Optimisation Sprint
Your products need to be discovered, compared, and recommended accurately by AI agents before agentic commerce changes the buyer journey.
OutputPrompt-panel audit, catalogue gap analysis, enriched product attributes, product graph inputs, and before/after AVO delta.
Request this path →Build6 weeks
Governed Agent Deployment Sprint
You have a workflow owner, accessible data, and a KPI baseline ready for a governed production agent.
OutputAgent architecture, HARNEXA Harness integration, approval gates, audit trail, CLEAR baseline, and handover.
Request this path →Regulatory2 weeks
EU AI Act Conformity Sprint
You need audit-ready technical foundations for Article 50 transparency and agent oversight review.
OutputObligation map, transparency documentation support, audit evidence map, and legal-review package.
Request this path →OperateMonthly
CAIO / AgentOps Retainer
You already have governed agents or an active deployment and need operating cadence, drift review, cost control, and executive reporting.
OutputMonthly AgentOps report, governance review, CLEAR drift check, usage bands, open risks, and next actions.
Request this path →ATLAS intake packet
What ATLAS will receive before founder review.
Packet qualityBasic request
The request can still be sent; missing evidence becomes founder follow-up.
Agentic Commerce Diagnostic
Governance gap assessment, top-3 agent candidates, value/risk ranking, and sprint roadmap.
- Duration
- 10 business days
- Best for
- You know agents matter, but need a governed workflow map, value case, and first deployment candidate.
- Recommended engagementAgentic Commerce Diagnostic10 business days / Governance gap assessment, top-3 agent candidates, value/risk ranking, and sprint roadmap.
Founder review packet
What this request becomes.
The request becomes a founder-review artifact: one commercial path, one stakeholder lens, one workflow boundary, and the evidence ATLAS needs before drafting.
Context qualityStarter request
Founder / COO / Agentic commerce assistant
Agentic Commerce Diagnostic
- Agentic Commerce Diagnostic fit brief
- ATLAS proposal input map
- Governance evidence checklist
- Founder follow-up questions
- Confirm the Agentic commerce assistant workflow owner and decision window.
- Validate data access, human approval boundary, and measurable KPI baseline.
- Decide whether Agentic Commerce Diagnostic is the correct first paid path.
- Mark which proof can be public, anonymized, or internal only.
- PRISM score and top gap pending
- Default buyer lens: Founder / COO / Agentic commerce assistant
- Protocol + AVO memo optional
- COMMERCE-ASSISTANT-READINESS-MEMO
- Budget owner and urgency window
- Decision-makers for operations, data, and risk
- What would make a diagnostic or deployment obviously useful
- PRISM readiness score or first capability gap
Founder review only. No autonomous outreach, proposal approval, deployment, public MCP execution, payment, or legal compliance certification.
Structured request
Give ATLAS enough signal to recommend one path.
The form opens a prepared email with the operational context HARNEXA needs for a useful first reply. Live diagnostic booking stays closed until founder availability is intentionally reopened.
Evidence packet not attached yetYou can still send the request. Attaching proof makes ATLAS sharper.
Add PRISM, a buyer dossier, or a Commerce Readiness Passport if you want the first reply to start from concrete evidence.
ATLAS copilot contextStarter request
Founder / COO / Agentic commerce assistant
- Agentic Commerce Diagnostic fit brief
- ATLAS proposal input map
- Governance evidence checklist
What happens next
A compact path to a real proposal.
- You send a short request with company, workflow, stack, and urgency.
- HARNEXA replies with fit questions or a proposed 20-minute scoping slot.
- If there is a fit, ATLAS drafts a fixed-scope proposal with one recommended engagement.
HARNEXA provides EU AI Act-aware governance foundations for client legal review. We do not certify EU AI Act compliance.
Direct email: raul@harnexa.ai