DPO / Legal / Risk Lead

Audit-ready foundations for deployer review.

Risk, legal, and data-protection teams need evidence before autonomy expands: intended purpose, oversight, data boundaries, sub-processors, retention, audit trail, and revocation.

Buyer evidence pathScore, inspect, package, request.
  1. Score readiness firstPRISMFind the first deployment gap before a call.
  2. Inspect proofPHANTOMReplay the governed approval boundary.
  3. Verify evidenceEvidence roomChoose role and workflow proof.
  4. Build passportPassportPackage readiness signals into one artifact.
  5. Send ATLAS intakeRequestCarry context into founder review.

Buyer pain

The problem is not interest in AI. It is proof at the decision boundary.

Agent pilots often reach legal review after tools, prompts, and data flows are already scattered across teams.

EU AI Act and GDPR review needs concrete system evidence, not a governance slide after launch.

Compliance buyers must distinguish audit-ready foundations from unsupported claims of certification or legal compliance.

Governed approach

HARNEXA turns the buyer question into inspectable artifacts.

Deployer review packet

Prepare intended purpose, risk classification, human oversight, disclosure points, audit rows, and monitoring evidence for qualified counsel.

Article 28 and processors

Publish processor roles, sub-processor list, retention posture, deletion/return inputs, and assistance obligations for review.

No-certification boundary

HARNEXA provides governance support and audit-ready foundations. It does not certify EU AI Act or GDPR compliance.

Evidence packet

What the buyer receives before the scope expands.

Next step

Start with the artifact this buyer will inspect first.

HARNEXA keeps the path narrow: one workflow, one buyer question, one evidence packet, and one founder-reviewed diagnostic or deployment path.

Book compliance review